Pages

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Censorship at its best...

...is the liberal U.S. news media HIDING the success and benchmarks of the war in Iraq. So, where do we go to get ACCURATE news coverage? British news outlets, of course!

It irks me that so many Americans think that the news outlets in the U.S. are giving them accurate and TRUTHFUL accounts of what happens in Iraq. If they were doing that, then there would be more support for our troops and more understanding of WHY we are over there to begin with. Sadly, so many are blinded by the smoke and mirrors that the liberal media put in place to hide the fact that they were WRONG. Sadly, so many are treating our troops today like those that came home from Vietnam just because the media is bent on an agenda to control society's decisions. That isn't freedom, people.

So, here is the point of the whole post, which does step away from my usual theme.

"Winning Isn't News By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Posted Monday, July 07, 2008 4:20 PM PT Iraq:

What would happen if the U.S. won a war but the media didn't tell the American public? Apparently, we have to rely on a British newspaper for the news that we've defeated the last remnants of al-Qaida in Iraq.

---------------------------------------------------------------

London's Sunday Times called it "the culmination of one of the most spectacular victories of the war on terror." A terrorist force that once numbered more than 12,000, with strongholds in the west and central regions of Iraq, has over two years been reduced to a mere 1,200 fighters, backed against the wall in the northern city of Mosul.

The destruction of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) is one of the most unlikely and unforeseen events in the long history of American warfare. We can thank President Bush's surge strategy, in which he bucked both Republican and Democratic leaders in Washington by increasing our forces there instead of surrendering. We can also thank the leadership of the new general he placed in charge there, David Petraeus, who may be the foremost expert in the world on counter-insurgency warfare. And we can thank those serving in our military in Iraq who engaged local Iraqi tribal leaders and convinced them America was their friend and AQI their enemy.

Al-Qaida's loss of the hearts and minds of ordinary Iraqis began in Anbar Province, which had been written off as a basket case, and spread out from there. Now, in Operation Lion's Roar the Iraqi army and the U.S. 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment is destroying the fraction of terrorists who are left. More than 1,000 AQI operatives have already been apprehended. Sunday Times reporter Marie Colvin, traveling with Iraqi forces in Mosul, found little AQI presence even in bullet-ridden residential areas that were once insurgency strongholds, and reported that the terrorists have lost control of its Mosul urban base, with what is left of the organization having fled south into the countryside.

Meanwhile, the State Department reports that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government has achieved "satisfactory" progress on 15 of the 18 political benchmarks - a big change for the better from a year ago. Things are going so well that Maliki has even for the first time floated the idea of a timetable for withdrawal of American forces. He did so while visiting the United Arab Emirates, which over the weekend announced that it was forgiving almost $7 billion of debt owed by Baghdad - an impressive vote of confidence from a fellow Arab state in the future of a free Iraq.

But where are the headlines and the front-page stories about all this good news? As the Media Research Center pointed out last week, "the CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News and CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 were silent Tuesday night about the benchmarks" that signaled political progress.

The war in Iraq has been turned around 180 degrees both militarily and politically because the president stuck to his guns. Yet apart from IBD, Fox News Channel and parts of the foreign press, the media don't seem to consider this historic event a big story. "

Chew on that for a bit...

4 comments:

Kim said...

Just wanted to say THANK YOU!!!!! for this post. I loved it!!!!

Dana said...

Fantasy is neither noteworthy, nor news

Maybe the "destruction" of al Qaeda in Iraq isn't such big news is because
it's not. All the experts have said that Al Qaeda in Iraq never amounted to
even 5% of the insurgency. So even if it was completely eliminated 95% of
the insurgents would still remain. Only if you make Al Qaeda a much bigger
deal than it actually is would it's reduction in numbers mean anything of
consequence.
In addition, simply eliminating Al Qaeda doesn't really diminish the
insurgency. The US military has armed 90 thousand Sunnis in Al Anbar
province. These are the same people who in the past worked with Al Qaeda to
attack Americans. Now they call them CLCs or "concerned local citizens".
Yeah, they're concerned all right, and now they are 90 thousand strong,
armed and trained by the US military. So when the US military reduces it's
strength in Iraq they will be combat ready to take on the Shia in the south
to regain control of the country.
All the surge has accomplished is to put a lid on the pressure cooker.
The minute you take them away the place goes downhill fast; and
one year of increased troops doesn't end a war that has gone on since 2003.
The truth is the "war" is going to go on as long as the US has its army in
Iraq. There will be ups and downs but a win is not in the cards. At least
not a win as described by the right wing,
You want to know why we are not popping the champagne corks and
singing the praises of the victory in Iraq brought about by the "surge"?
Well, that's simple. The important phrase is; how quickly we forget. It
wasn't all that long ago that we heard the exact same things after our great
"victory" over the Taliban in Afghanistan. It was celebrated far and wide
how our great military with a little help from the Northern Alliance of
Afghans had defeated the Taliban and that the war was won. But now we see
more troops are getting killed in Afghanistan than in Iraq and the Taliban
are back with a vengance. Commanders in Afghanistan say they are in
desperate need of more troops and that they are not winning in Afghanistan. How’s THAT for “winning”?

And as far as Fox NewS Channel being “accurate news coverage?
This entry in Wikipedia has the largest reference section I’ve ever seen!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies
Here’s a quote from Fox News’ Scott Norvell (London bureau chief)
“Even we at Fox News manage to get some lefties on the air occasionally, and often let them finish their sentences before we club them to death and feed the scraps to Karl Rove and Bill O'Reilly.” (entire article: http://www.slate.com/id/2119864/ ))
Try reading this entire article.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1067
Here’s a recent article about the protesters outside Fox: http://www.bthesite.com/archives/2008/07/dozens-protest-at-fox-news-hq/
and check out some of these too: http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/foxbias.htm

I like this new direction you are taking Jenny! Political commentation suits you! Keep it up, because it keeps me on my toes too! *grin*

Dana said...

Come on Jenny, post my response! That's what makes blogging so fun!

Miss you all,
D.

Jen said...

Sorry that it took so long to get the comment up, Dana. Things have been a bit busy.

But guess what!? I just KNEW I could get a response from you with this post! LOL!!

We miss your blogging...hurry up!

Hugs and kisses all around!